Whoops—’Cash for Clunkers’ Actually Hurt the Environment

“The program’s first mistake seems to have been its focus on car shredding, instead of car recycling. With 690,000 vehicles traded in, that’s a pretty big mistake.”

“But all that vehicular destruction did more than create unnecessary waste for the environment. It also had some far-reaching economic effects.” [TakePart.com]

About these ads

4 responses to “Whoops—’Cash for Clunkers’ Actually Hurt the Environment

  1. In addition, CfC drove a lot of small, independent car mechanics out of business, as their clientele got new cars.

  2. Frederick Michael

    There’s something abut destroying anything of value that makes me cringe. I knew it couldn’t be right.

  3. Progressives are like novice chess players. They make a move and feel oh-so-proud of themselves because they see how their action has increased their control over everybody else some microscopic amount, but they are totally incapable of visualizing how their opponents (ordinary people) are going to respond to their move.
    They are the poster children for the Law of Unintended Consequences.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s