You can’t play hockey with a broomstick.
Most scientists are familiar with the above graph, but please also show the trend since the beginning of the industrial revolution (~1860). A 16-year span is too short and the data are too noisy to extract meaningful conclusions about trends in global climate.
Why bother with the industrial revolution? Let’s start at the 0 AD? The result would be a messy sine wave starting and ending at about the same point (at today’s temperature) on a 1000 year period with a lot of short-term variation.
The real story with the temperature lack of rise is that it was unpredicted by any of the Global Circulation Models, invalidating them for prediction (no sane person believed they could actually model temperature on any timescale anyway)
It is not true that there is a “temperature lack of rise” in the above graph, and I don’t see how it invalidates any of the most prominent climate change models. What the graph above shows is that the global temperature increased by 0 degrees over the course of 15 years, with an uncertainty of about 0.02 degrees C/year. That is, it only says that there is a lack of rise at a rate faster than 0.02 degrees C/year (and for the sake of completeness, a lack of temperature decrease at a rate faster than 0.02 degrees C/year). An increase of 0.02 degrees C/year is consistent with the longer term trend, which shows a temperature anomaly increasing from about -0.2 degrees C to +0.4 degrees C, (roughly speaking) between 1970 and 2000. My point from before is that the graph above is noisy, but the longer-term trend is actually not.
It would be ideal to be able to extrapolate the graph beyond the industrial revolution back to 0 AD, as you write, but temperature records of the type shown in the graph do not go back that far, and if you wanted to make a comparison you would have to resort to indirect methods like analyzing tree rings or ice cores, and because these are not as reliable you run into the problem of signal to noise once again (e.g. your “messy sine wave”). In any case, it is inappropriate to combine temperature records of one type over one time period with records of another type over another time period. That is precisely the “hockey stick” controversy. I ask for a graph going back to 1850 because that is the farthest back into history that this particular type of data set goes. (That data set above is, by the way, the most reliable type of temperature data set available.)
I ask for a graph going back to beyond the medieval warm period. Why just go back to 1850 when we were coming out of the Little Ice Age? Unless, of course you want to show a dramatic increase in temperature. It’s amazing how AGW advocates use day to day weather and single yearly data to support their advocacy, but lash out at a mere 16 years of insignificant temperature changes that fly in the face of the predictions made by corrupt computer models using distorted and manipulated data.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of follow-up comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 3,932 other followers