California may fall into the sea

The Sunday New York Time’s story, Rising Seas, Vanishing Coastlines, has been repeated across mainstream media today. “Even the most conservative estimates for for rising sea levels (five feet at a minimum) would almost completely submerge New Orleans, Miami Beach and sizable portions of other American cities without engineered protection,” predicted Benjamin Strauss and Robert Kopp. “However, present trends seem to indicate a more dire scenario,” they said.

Not to be outdone, Los Angeles Times brought the California angle to the doomsday scenario. Anticipating “climate change intensified storms,” the state is apparently moving forward with “common sense adaptations.”

California confronts a sea change

With 3.5 million Californians living within three feet of sea level, and the best available science projecting a 3- to 5-foot rise in sea level for the state by 2100, doing nothing would be irresponsible….

In fact, for the next few decades it will be extreme storms, with their accompanying waves and king tides, not sea-level rise per se that will have the most impact in the state, according to U.S. Geological Survey testimony last year to the California Ocean Protection Council, the state’s umbrella agency for coordinating its response to rising seas.

For starters, California is ahead of most states in its attempts to address the problem at its source by reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Over half of U.S. venture capital investment in clean technology is now taking place in California… About half the towns along California’s coast have begun developing climate adaptation policies. “It’s not uncertainty about the science keeping them from acting,” says Amber Mace, former California Ocean Protection Council executive director.

That “success” of California’s investments into climate change policies might have something to do with businesses exiting the state in-mass. Californian, Jeffers Dodge, posted a list of businesses leaving Sacramento, writing:

The list will grow as Sacramento considers more measures that will increase corporate taxes, increase workers’ comp costs, increase regulatory reporting requirements (along with higher fines for minor infractions), increase gasoline and diesel-fuel taxes, increase water rates, increase electric-power rates, and increase assorted fees that will cause services to become more expensive.

Even the latest U-Haul Index reveals that Californians are renting one-way trucks out of California. The New American reported on Friday:

They have lots of reasons to leave. According to the Tax Foundation, “Tax Freedom Day” arrives earlier in Texas than it does in California, due to its zero individual and corporate income tax and a lower sales tax. Put together, Texas’ state and local tax burden is less than eight percent of income, well below the national average of nearly 10 percent, while California’s is almost 12 percent. This enormous disparity puts California the 48th out of the 50 states in the foundation’s overall business tax climate index, while Texas ranks ninth.

It isn’t all about taxes, however. Its regulatory environment and yawning fiscal deficits are chasing companies away to more favorable locales. Part is the state’s determined efforts to increase still further its tax burden on high income earners — now an astounding 13 percent — along with its implementation of policies favored by the Obama administration in Washington.

As Joel Kotkin of NewGeography.com put it, “California will serve as the prime testing ground for President Obama’s form of post economic liberalism. Every dream program that the Administration embraces — cap and trade, massive taxes on the rich, high speed rail — is either in place or on the drawing boards”

Despite the state’s efforts to redistribute the wealth from those who earned it to those who didn’t, “the ranks of the poor have swollen to the point that the state, with 12% of the nation’s population, accounts for one-third of its welfare cases,” notes Kotkin.

About these ads

15 responses to “California may fall into the sea

  1. I suspect that intelligent people will just leave California. The Democrats have turned the state into imbecile-land and tax-land and regulation-land. If you have brains and money you leave California and the those that remain eat Democrats for lunch.

    • Sorry to say I know one intelligent person in CA, LA to be specific…. and I suspect they’ve been too badly impoverished by the Kalifornia government, to be able to get away.

  2. “California may fall into the sea”

    Well that’s one way to reduce the budget deficit.

  3. I thought a super-quake (“The Big One”) was supposed to split California in two and half was supposed to fall into the Pacific, because Edgar Cayce said so. Las Vegas should have been beachfront by now. That was the claim during the 60′s.

  4. It’s a novel way of driving down land prices, before making a killing by snapping them up. The same technique was used to drive down the price of coal stock, which were then snapped up by that evergreen, George Soros.
    Some people never learn.

  5. 5 feet rise by 2100. That’s about 175 mm/decade. I thought the current rate was about 3 mm/decade. Does this 58x rate increase start next year or is there some exponential sea level rise increase? The big quake is a higher probability, methinks.

    Remember, all these immigrating Californians take their dreams of a socialist workers paradise with them.

    • Possibly, but I think it more likely that those who immigrate will leave those dreams behind.

      • Unfortunately, neighboring low cost states get Californians who immediately decry the lack of services (what about the poor, the women the children) and then they vote in high cost services. Nevada is being transformed by retiring Californians as we write. It is really sad.

  6. Best available science = the direst unfounded preditions we could find? Could Nancy Pelosi keep her seat if her district disappears? Never mind, she’s way up on the hill.

  7. I am no longer surprised by the use of complete and total junk science and the total lack of critical thinking skills on the part of the media and politicians to sell their snake oil. If sea levels don’t start rising soon, they’ll have to rise 3 to 5 feet in 2099 just to meet the 2100 projections!

  8. Not to worry folks! BO has four more years to lower the sea levels 5 or 6 feet at least and he will do it by executive order.

  9. What the hell is “post economic liberalism”? Another name for socialism? Communism? Spendism? Borrowism? If taken literally, it’s the form of liberalism that comes after economics. I also thought New Orleans was already below sea level and has suffered greatly from the “engineered protection” it enjoys.

    • Yep, you have to look up to see ships on the River in NOLA. The first place I lived was well below the lake level. Not a big problem as long as the pumps worked.

  10. Any greenie wanting to sell up and move out of their Malibu beach front ’cause of the coming flood, I’m up for a bargain… .

  11. We can only hope.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s