Exxon for carbon tax with conditions

“A carbon tax should be made revenue neutral via tax offsets in other areas.” [Bloomberg]

7 responses to “Exxon for carbon tax with conditions

  1. “Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) is part of a growing coalition backing a carbon tax as an alternative to costly regulation, giving newfound prominence to an idea once anathema in Washington.”

    So we will get a carbon tax AND costly regulation.

  2. If I have the figures right, revenue is 16% of GDP and expenditures are 25% of GDP. Revenue neutral makes no sense at all.

  3. (Another) Pandora’s Box is about to be opened, and another Constitution power explicitly reserved for the Congress is about to be handed over to federal bureaucrats who are unelected and fire-proof. In tis particular case, it would be left to bureaucrats to define what counts as “carbon.” How could anything go wrong? If successful, Spineless Republicans are to blame because Democrats are expected to promote this stuff.

  4. What’s the point? The whole reason for the tax is to make energy more expensive so that people will use less (supposedly, although I suspect it’s just to control them better).

  5. People hoping to see energy policy leadership from Exxon were not hoping for this.

  6. … as long as the corporate welfare flows Exxon’s way.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s