Energy and Climate – Dr Kevin E Trenberth

Hmm…

On Oct 14, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Kevin Trenberth wrote:

Hi Tom
How come you do not agree with a statement that says we are no where close to knowing where energy is going or whether clouds are changing to make the planet brighter. We are not close to balancing the energy budget. The fact that we can not account for what is happening in the climate system makes any consideration of geoengineering quite hopeless as we will never be able to tell if it is successful or not! It is a travesty!
Kevin

Compare and contrast with:

This is the first in a series of articles by renowned climate scientists. In it, Dr Kevin Trenberth of UCAR talks about energy and climate and addresses the intriguing issue of “missing energy”

Dr Kevin E Trenberth Biography
Youtube clip about missing energy

Climate change is very much involved with energy, most commonly in the form of heat but other forms of energy are also important. Radiation comes in from the sun (solar radiation at short wavelengths), and every body radiates according to its temperature (proportional to the fourth power of absolute temperature), so that on Earth we, and the surface and atmosphere radiate at infrared wavelengths.  Weather and climate on Earth are determined by the amount and distribution of incoming radiation from the sun.  For an equilibrium climate, global mean outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) necessarily balances the incoming absorbed solar radiation (ASR), but with redistributions of energy within the climate system to enable this to happen on a global basis.  Incoming radiant energy may be scattered and reflected by clouds and aerosols (dust and pollution) or absorbed in the atmosphere.  The transmitted radiation is then either absorbed or reflected at the Earth’s surface. Radiant solar (shortwave) energy is transformed into sensible heat (related to temperature), latent energy (involving different water states), potential energy (involving gravity and altitude) and kinetic energy (involving motion) before being emitted as longwave infrared radiant energy.  Energy may be stored, transported in various forms, and converted among the different types, giving rise to a rich variety of weather or turbulent phenomena in the atmosphere and ocean.  Moreover the energy balance can be upset in various ways, changing the climate and associated weather.

The human influence on climate, arising mostly from the changing composition of the atmosphere, affects energy flows. Increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases have led to a post-2000 imbalance at the TOA of 0.9±0.5 W m-2 (Trenberth et al. 2009) (Fig. 1), that produces “global warming”, or more correctly, an energy imbalance.  Tracking how much extra energy has gone back to space and where this energy has accumulated is possible, with reasonable closure for 1993 to 2003. Over the past 50 years, the oceans have absorbed about 90% of the total heat added to the climate system while the rest goes to melting sea and land ice, and warming the land surface and atmosphere. Because carbon dioxide concentrations have further increased since 2003 the amount of heat subsequently being accumulated should be even greater. However,  there was a slight decrease in solar insolation from 2000 until 2009 with the ebbing 11-year sunspot cycle; enough to offset 10 to 15% of the estimated net human induced warming.

RMetS

About these ads

2 Responses to Energy and Climate – Dr Kevin E Trenberth

  1. I reckon we should keep heating the joint up, because we all live near rhe sea, and can just jump in to cool off. And if the seas rise? Well we move to higher ground.and shift our airports. No big deal. The Second World War was a lot tougher. Remember? Seriously. It’s freezing to death that I worry about. Let’s hear it for global warming -

  2. The concept of “equilibrium” is misunderstood. The climate ‘equilibrium’ involves conditions that vary widely in space and time, that incluence other conditions even as they change, and form a highly coupled, non-linear system of an uncounted number of variables.
    In chemistry and physics, there are two types of equilibrium: static (the conditions do not change) and dynamic (the conditions do change in a predictable way to return at some time in the future to the current state).
    This does not hold true in any sense for ‘climate.’
    The climate is characterized by what chaos theory defines as an ‘attractor’ – a meandering path of the ‘state’ of the system that wanders through a limited space of the relevant variables and *almost* retraces paths which it has travelled before – for a while: http://www.fractalwisdom.com/images/strange.gif

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s