HWGA: Lipstick chemical alert: Ingredient in hundreds of household products ’causes heart problems’

A chemical commonly used in lipsticks, face washes and toothpaste may cause heart and muscle problems, according to scientists.

They found triclosan, which is in hundreds of household products, can hinder the process by which muscles, including the heart, receive signals from the brain.

In tests on mice, they noted a ‘dramatic’ 25 per cent reduction in heart function within 20 minutes of exposure, and warned there is ‘strong evidence’ it could affect human health.

However regulators and other experts insist triclosan levels in products are safe, and that the doses injected into the mice were higher than those to which humans would ever be exposed.

Although previous studies have found that triclosan may have links to thyroid and fertility problems, this is the first time its effects have been tested on muscles.

Scientists had thought that the chemical – which was devised to prevent bacterial infections in hospitals – was metabolised quickly by the body without harmful effects.

However, the researchers at the University of California say it may remain active and be transported to organs, causing damage.

Professor Isaac Pessah, who led the study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, said: ‘These findings provide strong evidence that it is of concern to both human and environmental health.

Daily Mail

About these ads

4 responses to “HWGA: Lipstick chemical alert: Ingredient in hundreds of household products ’causes heart problems’

  1. It’s true. Lipstick applied to you by a sexy babe causes your heart to race.

  2. Strong evidence “it could affect human health” hey? How strong?

  3. It not only causes your own heart to race, but it causes a dangerous spike in your wife’s blood pressure. ;-)

  4. “Professor Isaac Pessah, who led the study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, said: ‘These findings provide strong evidence that it is of concern to both human and environmental health.” – Sure…why not ban it again? Or how about calling some chemists into the mix?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s