Senators press EPA to cut ethanol mandate

As the worst drought in more than 50 years withers the Midwest corn crop, 25 senators urged the Environmental Protection Agency to cut the mandate that requires fuel blenders to add grain-based ethanol to gasoline.

The senators representing 25 percent of the chamber urged EPA chief Lisa Jackson to adjust the Renewable Fuels Standard, or RFS, that requires fuel blenders to mix 13.2 billion gallons of ethanol into gasoline this year.

The mandate rises steadily until peaking at 15 billion gallons per year in 2015 and holding that level through 2022.

The lawmakers blame the mandate for raising the price of corn — the main feedstock for U.S. ethanol refining — which threatens to increase feed costs for livestock producers and eventually saddle consumers with higher food costs.

Some 40 percent of the U.S. corn crop is now used to make ethanol, though some byproducts of the process are fed to livestock.

“Adjusting the corn grain-ethanol mandate of the RFS can offer some relief from tight corn supplies and high prices,” said the senators including Ben Cardin, a Maryland Democrat, and Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican.

None of the senators are from a major corn growing state where the RFS remains popular with farmers and ethanol distillers for the jobs it supports.

As the drought threatens crops, the call to reform the RFS is growing louder. Last week, nearly one-third of the lawmakers in the 435 member U.S. House of Representatives signed a letter urging the government to ease the mandate.

Reuters

About these ads

4 responses to “Senators press EPA to cut ethanol mandate

  1. These Senators can bite me. RFS comes from the Bush era Energy Policy Act of 2005. They are asking the EPA to break the law.

    Senators, this is your baby, not the EPA’s. Change the law, or shut up.

  2. Indeed, Gamecock. If they were serious, they’d not beg – they’d change the law. If they were truly serious, they’d defund and change the charter of the EPA to limit it to its original purpose.

  3. I am going to find out how our Rino senator and representative here in SD feel about this.

    • Don’t get excised by this. It has the earmarks of an NGO press release. The senators aren’t named; their group isn’t named. I see this as some NGO sending a survey to the senators’ offices. 25 gave an answer they liked. They sprinkled in a couple of quotes, which may not have been have come from the survey, and, presto, you have a press release. Coburn may not even know of this; his staff may have answered the survey.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s