EPA to Withdraw Proposed Rule On Livestock Facility Reporting Requirements

EPA will withdraw proposed rule that would have required all concentrated animal feeding operations, regardless of whether they discharge into water, to report information about their operations.

The Environmental Protection Agency will withdraw a proposed rule, widely opposed by livestock and other industry groups, that would have required all concentrated animal feeding operations to report information about their operations, regardless of whether they discharge into water.

In a notice that will soon be published in the Federal Register, the agency said it would collect basic information on CAFOs through existing sources at the state and local level. EPA said it had established a memorandum of understanding with the Association of Clean Water Administrators, which will assist the agency in collecting information.

EPA posted the notice on its website July 13. The agency said that working with states was an efficient approach that would “not duplicate efforts” from existing programs. The agency reserved the right to initiate a similar rulemaking at a future date.

First proposed in November 2011 as part of a settlement with the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Waterkeeper Alliance, and the Sierra Club, the rule would have required all CAFOs to report data on the size of their facilities and basic operational characteristics. The proposed rule also offered the option of only requiring information from CAFOs in watersheds with poor water quality compliance problems (NRDC v. EPA, 5th Cir., No. 08-61093, settlement reached 6/16/2010).

Another option in the proposed rule would have used already available information from CAFOs with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits.

The settlement resolved a lawsuit filed by environmental groups opposing a 2008 CAFO rule that excluded certain facilities from reporting requirements.

Bloomberg BNA

About these ads

2 Responses to EPA to Withdraw Proposed Rule On Livestock Facility Reporting Requirements

  1. The EPA found that a rule was to stupid even for them?

  2. Ben of Houston

    Ralph, this is surprisingly common, especially under Obama. I don’t even bother reading most of the proposed rules anymore. By the time it becomes final, it has changed beyond recognition, or at least enough to make your notes irrelevant. Then, if it gets withdrawn or vacated, you just wasted hours or days of your time.

    If your blood pressure is ever too low, try doing a search on Boiler MACT.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s