And you thought the California Global Warming Solutions Act (AB32) was all about limiting greenhouse gas emissions, didn’t you? Think again.
There is a brewing fight in Sacramento over how to spend the gold expected to start pouring in when the Golden State starts its carbon cap and trade program. The original intent of AB32 was to use the proceeds from the carbon permit auctions to invest in technologies and programs that reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Makes sense, right?
But the law was passed in the boom times of 2006. Today six years later as the first carbon cap auction is being readied for later this year, California has a $16 billion general fund deficit and more than a few pet projects are going begging for money. The State has acted like a giant vacuum cleaner suctioning up money from cities, counties and schools. It abandoned a decades old economic redevelopment program and seized the revenue from redevelopment agencies to help close the budget gap.
The only way California is going to dig itself out of this fiscal hole is by winning the lottery. But wait—it believes it has the winning ticket, but first it wants to try the ‘soak the rich’ play one more time before all the rich move to Texas or Nevada or anywhere else.
Governor Brown has proposed tax increases on the wealthiest Californians on the November 2012 ballot but one tax measure to increase cigarette taxes by one dollar per pack on the June primary election ballot is still losing in the recount process. Not a good omen for the November election.
So what does this have to do with cap and trade revenue?