Junk Science Week: 2052? More like 2084

Last October, at a conference in Ottawa, systems-management guru Dennis Meadows declared from the podium that it was already “too late for sustainable development.”

This would surely be dispiriting news for those who will gather next week at Rio+20 to discuss the nebulous topic. After all, Mr. Meadows is a scientific authority, the lead author of the 1972 book The Limits to Growth, one of the most influential works of modern times.

Limits had been commissioned by a group of self-appointed global guardians called The Club of Rome to study the world “problematique.” According to its blurb, the authors’ “inescapable conclusions are beyond anyone’s grimmest fears.” They had studied the future “with the aid of a giant computer” and it was a place of resource exhaustion, ecological “overshoot” and civilizational collapse. The authors admitted that their model might not be perfect, but asserted that their conclusions wouldn’t change. They thus confirmed that theirs wasn’t a scientific hypothesis to be tested; it was an unshakeable moral conviction to be confirmed. It rejected economics and was impervious to contrary evidence. It was pure junk science.

Financial Post

About these ads

2 Responses to Junk Science Week: 2052? More like 2084

  1. Eric Baumholer

    All true believers know that ‘sustainable development’ is an oxymoron.

  2. Alice Cheshire

    If we’re all going to die anyway and we passed the tipping point, let’s party and have a good time! Forget those limits, forget “save the earth”. It’s too late–give up and live like there’s no tomorrow because there won’t be.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s