IBD: U.N. Law Of The Sea Treaty Must Be Stopped

The administration begins the push for ratification of a 1982 treaty that would end America’s sovereignty on the high seas, limit our freedoms on land and speed up the global redistribution of wealth and power.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told Sen. John Kerry’s Senate Foreign Relations Committee last Wednesday that the freedom of the sea once guaranteed by the British Royal Navy and then the U.S. Navy should be in the hands of United Nations bureaucrats in Montego Bay, Jamaica, enforcers of the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) he said we must ratify.

It used to be that a carrier battle group led by 90,000 tons of American diplomacy was sufficient to ensure that no nation could threaten our freedom of navigation and that of other countries.

But the nation whose motto was “we win, they lose” under President Reagan is replacing it with President Obama’s “mother, may we?”

“If we are not a party to this treaty and can’t deal with it at the table, then we have to deal with it at sea with our naval power, and once that happens, we clearly increase the risk for confrontation,” Panetta told members of the committee.

Once upon a time, other nations were afraid of us; now we’re afraid of them.

LOST would codify the “global test” Kerry uses to assess the validity of U.S. activities. For example, Communist China, a LOST signatory, contends the treaty bans the Proliferation Security Initiative under which we can stop and search ships on the high seas suspected of transporting WMDs on behalf of or for use by terrorists.

What would we do if China’s claim to undisputed sovereignty over the 1 million square miles of the South China Sea were honored by this new international body to which we would be subservient? Would the U.S. Navy quietly keep off their grass?

Subscribe to the IBD Editorials Podcast
LOST establishes an International Seabed Authority with the power to regulate 70% of the earth’s surface, placing seabed mining, fishing rights, deep-sea oil exploration and even the activities of the U.S. Navy under control of a global bureaucracy.

It even provides for a global tax that would be paid directly to the ISA by companies seeking to develop resources in and under the world’s oceans.

The treaty was originally finalized in the 1980s but rejected by Reagan over concerns it would cede U.S. sovereignty to the ISA and could force the United States to hand over sensitive technology to Soviet-allied states.


4 responses to “IBD: U.N. Law Of The Sea Treaty Must Be Stopped

  1. Each, every, no, in fact, ALL departed Admirals, Captains, Officers, and seamen and Waves who took part in our nation’s glorious naval history, are now spinning in their graves at the mere consideration of ratification.

    Hear long, the cries of our late beloved naval heros – and listen!!!

  2. “Would the U.S. Navy quietly keep off their grass?” Well, if it IS their grass. ??? – Err…….What would you do ?? Trespass??? I thought private property was sacrosanct?

    • only if it is private property! What of the countries thst dispute China’s claims, such as Japan, Vietnam, Malaysia and Indonesia. With LOST signed we would have not ability to come to these countries aid when, and I mean when, China starts to strong arm them. An this is just a small part of the problems with LOST. One Carrier grou is equal to the next 3 navies(and we have 4 groups I believe), why should we give that advantage away to countries that have a less than a favorable view of us.

      • Ok. OK.—- ONE day, in the distant future there will be genuine international agreement on all national boundaries, including “territorial waters”, and that will be policed by a genuine accepted world policing body with teeth at least equivalent to any major power. Then justice may genuinely prevail.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s