A well-known British climate skeptic writes an extensive essay laying out his disagreements with climatologist Scott Denning’s recent Yale Forum posting.
British climate skeptic Christopher Monckton is having none of Colorado State University climate scientist Scott Denning’s recent posting calling for a change in the culture of climate change dialogues.
Denning in that piece singled-out Monckton and two other climate science skeptics as unlikely to have been swayed by Denning’s 2010 and 2011 presentations before skeptical Heartland Institute annual meeting audiences. He was right on that point, Monckton confirmed in a 10-page 4,547-word essay he submitted for posting.
Given the length of that response, The Yale Forum has decided not to post it as either a feature or as a comment, as it vastly exceeds the length of all but a few previous postings. The full Monckton commentary is available here.
For those who don’t know: Yale global-warming activities are a wholly-owned subsidiary of Al Gore, due to Gore’s massive donations to them — unprecedented among all US universities.
Why do they keep using false descriptors like “climate skeptic”? None of us are skeptical about the existence of a “climate”, nor are we skeptical about it changing. I am sick of this not so subtle slam on us every time there’s an article from the idiot ‘progressives’ (sic).
Does being a bit skeptical about their ability to control the climate make me a “climate skeptic?”