Benefits of fluoride uncontestable, medical officer of health says

Oh I can almost hear the anti fluoridation zealots leaping to their keyboards…

Every citizen should have access to fluoridated water because the health benefits are uncontestable, Ontario’s chief medical officer of health says.

Arlene King said about 70 per cent of the province’s residents currently have access to a water supply that contains fluoride, and “that’s not good enough.”

Her comments, contained in a new report on oral health and stressed in an interview, are a not-so-subtle rebuke to the growing number of communities that are rethinking fluoridation as a cost-saving measure – chief among them the City of Toronto. There are also groups who oppose adding the chemical to water supplies.

Dr. King said there is an “irrefutable economic argument” in support of community-based water fluoridation. “The average lifetime cost per person to fluoridate is less than the cost of one dental filling,” she said. She also dismissed out of hand suggestions that fluoride poses a health risk.

The new report, Oral Health – More than Just Cavities, notes that dental caries – more commonly known as cavities – are the most prevalent chronic condition in humans, affecting 60 to 90 per cent of school-aged children and almost all adults.

They are caused by bacteria that colonize the tooth surface and produce acids that destroy the enamel. Cavities can lead to infection, pain, chewing problems and gastrointestinal disorders. Periodontal or gum disease is also caused by oral bacteria and has been linked to a number of serious health conditions, including heart disease.

“Oral health is about more than cavities and clean white teeth,” Dr. King said.

Much of her new report focuses on a lack of access to prevention and treatment of oral health problems, particularly for low-income families.

About these ads

3 Responses to Benefits of fluoride uncontestable, medical officer of health says

  1. Yada_yada Mac

    Wow. She says it’s good for people …but flouride does not fight bacteria or decay. Wow. Talk about junk reporting junk science..

  2. I don’t care. It is immoral to mass medicate a poulation against their will for the supposed benefit of a sub-population. There is no way to regulate dosage, and only 1% of municipal water is actully consumed, the rest goes into the environment. If the fertilizer companies were simply dumping it into the water supply, they would be crucified. But, they can sell the waste and government will do it for them.
    Since the CDC issued a warning about it in infant’s formula, is it not unwise to suspect that other adverse effects are likely?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s