Aus: A warmist smear as bogus as their theory

A warmists’ smear turns out to be as fact-free as their scares:

CLAIMS that some of Australia’s leading climate change scientists were subjected to death threats as part of a vicious and unrelenting email campaign have been debunked by the Privacy Commissioner.

Timothy Pilgrim was called in to adjudicate on a Freedom of Information application in relation to Fairfax and ABC reports last June alleging that Australian National University climate change researchers were facing the ongoing campaign and had been moved to “more secure buildings” following explicit threats.

In a six-page ruling made last week, Mr Pilgrim found that 10 of 11 documents, all emails, “do not contain threats to kill” and the other “could be regarded as intimidating and at its highest perhaps alluding to a threat”.

Chief Scientist Ian Chubb, who was the ANU’s vice-chancellor at the time, last night admitted he did not have any recollection of reading the emails before relocating the university’s researchers. “I don’t believe I did,” Professor Chubb told The Australian…

The FOI application was lodged by Sydney climate blogger Simon Turnill… The university refused to release the documents, citing a clause in the Freedom of Information Act that exempts documents that “would, or could reasonably be expected to … endanger the life or physical safety of any person” from disclosure.

This is astonishing.

Prominent warmists last year used these fake claims of death threats to try to discredit sceptics as dangerous and uncivilised – and freeze them out of the debate:

ANU vice-chancellor Professor Ian Young says scientists at the university in Canberra have received large numbers of emails, including death threats and abusive phone calls, threatening to attack the academics in the street if they continue their research…

The Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies’ CEO, Anna-Maria Arabia, says the extreme behaviour represents a worrying trend and political leaders must put a stop to the misinformation campaign.

The Fairfax Canberra Times was also only too happy to report this beat-up and help smear and silence the sceptics:

Australia’s leading climate change scientists are being targeted by a vicious, unrelenting email campaign that has resulted in police investigations of death threats…

Australia’s new chief scientist, former ANU vice-chancellor Professor Ian Chubb has condemned these email threats as ‘’an outrageous attack’’ on open and public debate…

Federal Climate Change Minster Greg Combet said harassment of scientists or other researchers was unacceptable….

“People whipping up anxiety over a carbon price should temper their language and engage in rational debate rather than irrational scare mongering,’’ Mr Combet said.

Australian Greens deputy leader Christine Milne said the emails were ‘‘an orchestrated, extremist anti-science campaign attempting to threaten and intimidate people into silence.’’

Claims of death threats were even incorporated into a campaign to “respect the science” – or, in fact, to “respect” only those bits of the science that backed the warmists:

Anna Maria Arabia is the CEO of the nation’s peak scientific body, FASTS – the Federation of Australian Science and Technological Societies.

Ms Arabia, who is launching the ‘Respect the Science’ campaign at Parliament House today, told ABC News Breakfast she had received a fresh death threat only this morning….

Earlier this month, a number of the country’s top climate change scientists, including several at the Australian National University (ANU), were targeted by death threats and reported receiving abusive phone calls for months…

Ms Arabia says today’s campaign launch is aimed at restoring public confidence in science, as the hysteria in the climate debate spills over into attacks on all research.

“It is really aimed at looking at the misinformation campaign that’s being run against the scientific evidence largely coming from the climate change debate … and seeing how that is undermining the nation-building work of our scientists,” she said.

And warming extremists such as academic Tim Lambert were only too keen to apply the smear against particular sceptics:

But will the Bolt’s (sic) of the world stop and think of the hate they have created, the vile they have generated and the attack on science?

That so many media outlets of the Left repeated these claims so unquestioningly says a lot about their gullibility. Do they swallow the rest of the alarmists’ claims so easily, too?

Herald Sun

About these ads

3 responses to “Aus: A warmist smear as bogus as their theory

  1. The obvious next step is to discover how much money the university spent on consultants, increased security and office relocations. Aside from smearing sceptics, there were real costs imposed in all of this…

    http://progcontra.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/climate-scientists-death-threat-scam.html

    What it needs is another FOI request to discover those costs so that people can demand those responsible pay it back to the Aussie tax-payer.

  2. They say a lie can circle the world while the truth is still getting its boots on.
    The little white lie about ‘death threats’ played so well into the narrative that the uncritical thinkers (be definitiion, non-scientists) on the ‘warmist’ side swallowed it completely uncritically, proving they are not really scientists.
    This gullible acceptance helped the lie grow. It is now a Big Lie, and it will endure despite all the debunkings, simply because there are some people who WANT to believe it.

  3. Eric Baumholer

    People who have rested their careers on fears of CO2 will naturally feel ‘threatened’ by those who disagree with them. Add in the notion that the disagreement is widespread, and that some of those skeptics are angry, or worse yet, take the low road with ad homs. Add in some paranoia (like we saw in the Climategate memos) and it’s not hard to see death treats in places where others cannot find them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s