Migrating waterfowl die from lack of water

Gosh. And there never were any droughts before, right?

The deaths of up to 20,000 migrating birds this year in a wildlife refuge near the Oregon border has renewed debate about resource management on the Klamath River, where myriad competing interests are fighting for water rights.

The waterfowl began dropping dead from avian cholera in February after a lack of water forced as many as 2 million birds to bunch together in the Lower Klamath National Wildlife Refuge, said representatives of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Experts said a lack of rain during peak migration and water delivery obligations by the Bureau of Reclamation left sensitive wetlands along the Pacific Flyway dry. The result was the worst die-off in the region in about a decade.

In normal years the whole refuge is flooded, but “only about half the acres on the refuge were flooded going into this spring,” said Matthew Baun, the spokesman for the Fish and Wildlife Service. “We had more than the normal number of migrating waterfowl this year coming into the refuge. What that did was concentrate the birds on about half the wetlands, which enhanced disease transmission.”

Biologists and volunteers disposed of thousands of carcasses in an attempt to prevent the further spread of the disease. The problem seems to have dissipated as the spring rain helped fill the wetlands and fewer birds showed up in April as the migration wound down, Baun said. Birders and other environmental groups nevertheless point to the die-off as another example of resource mismanagement.

SF Chronicle

About these ads

One Response to Migrating waterfowl die from lack of water

  1. “The bacterial disease, which does not affect humans, killed only a small proportion of the 1.8 million to 2 million birds that used the Klamath Basin. Still, volunteers and refuge workers picked up 3,774 dead birds between Feb. 21 and April 7. They estimated that between 10,000 and 20,000 birds died from the disease.”

    10,000 or 20,000? That’s quite a spread.
    I’m sure we can trust these zealots. The
    press does.

    The birders’ complaint is that water isn’t
    managed to the benefit of birders. Why
    the government would let farmers have
    some of it is beyond their comprehension.

    We had a similar situation here two years
    ago. The legacy press was all over the
    local power company for not managing
    their hydro dams for the benefit of
    kayakers downstream. Pure decadence.
    The very existence of the area’s cities
    is due to the hydro dams produced
    electricity, and the press thinks kayakers
    should have priority.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s