Low price of emission rights ruining cap and trade system

The European Union began its trade in carbon dioxide emissions at the beginning of 2005. The system was supposed to become a cornerstone or the flagship of the EU’s climate policy, which would show the way to the other world powers following in its wake.

Now, more than seven years later, the flagship is running aground, and the fleets of the rest of the world are each looking for their own courses.

The problem with the EU’s Emissions Trading System (ETS) is an oversupply of emission rights.

Over the years far too many emission licences have been sold to industrial plants and electricity producers. Now that production has declined because of the recession, demand for licences is low, which has pushed the price of emission rights far too low – to about six euros per tonne of carbon dioxide emissions.

One of the most important aims of the ETS was to encourage producers of electricity to move away from fossil fuels, such as natural gas and coal, to renewable sources. The higher price of electricity was supposed to encourage investments, which we consumers would have to pay as a result of emissions trading.

The higher the price of emission rights, the more electricity costs, and the more the producers of electricity earn. Everyone agrees that six euros per ton of emissions is too little to serve as an incentive for investments. The price should be at least EUR 20, or possibly even EUR 40.

So EU officials and climate policy experts have a problem. The price should be pushed up. The best way to do this could be to withdraw some of the emission rights from the market, thereby reducing supply. But there are different ways of doing this and there is no agreement on which ways to choose.

Helsingin Sanomat

3 responses to “Low price of emission rights ruining cap and trade system

  1. Europe is bankrupt, so indeed let’s make energy more expensive by all means. Incredible how the ecologists have infiltrated upper echelons.

  2. A point of semantics: anything that is a ‘right’ should be free – like exhaling (emitting CO2). If they make you pay for it then they have taken away your ‘right ‘ and turned it into a ‘privilege.’
    On a related point, there is another key difference: when those who make the ‘rules’ tell you you should or shouldn’t do something, that’s ‘regulation;’ when they tell you that you MUST or must NOT do something, that’s ‘tyranny’.

  3. Time to move the goal posts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s