Hockey Schtick: New paper finds Urban Heat Island effect should not be ‘considered exclusively a nighttime phenomenon anymore’

A paper published today in the Journal of Climate uses a new method comparing satellite and surface temperature observations to assess the Urban Heat Island [UHI] effect.

The paper finds “UHI is stronger during the day and summer than during nighttime and winter,” which is the opposite of the predictions of computer models and assumption of most climate scientists heretofore that UHI is a “nocturnal phenomenon.

Hockey Schtick

About these ads

2 Responses to Hockey Schtick: New paper finds Urban Heat Island effect should not be ‘considered exclusively a nighttime phenomenon anymore’

  1. “which is the opposite of the predictions of computer models and assumption of most climate scientists …”

    the word “unexpectedly” needs to be in there, as in almost everything related to libtard claims and plans

  2. I’ve been wondering for some time now if
    air conditioning contributes to UHI. Almost all buildings in the U.S. have A/C and when
    the inside of a building is cooled the heat
    must be transferred to the outside air. This would mean that UHI is far more prevalent
    during summer and daylight hours.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s