Jo Nova: So is the hotspot a “fingerprint” or signature? Is it unique?

Some people claim that I mislead people. But it seems they are the misled — not by me, but by their own heroes.

In the Skeptics Handbook I wrote:

The greenhouse signature is missing
If Greenhouse gases are warming the earth we are supposed to see the first signs of it in the patch of air 10 kilometers above the tropics. But this “hot spot” just isn’t there.

Weather balloons have scanned the global atmosphere but could find no sign of the predicted “hot-spot” warming pattern that greenhouse gases would leave.

Sources: Sources: (A) Predicted changes 1958-1999. Synthesis and Assessment Report 1.1, 2006, CCSP, Chapter 1, p 25, based on Santer et al. 2000; (B) Same document, recorded change/decade, Hadley Centre weather balloons 1979-1999, p. 116 , fig. 5.7E, from Thorne et al., 2005

With all the benefits of hindsight, it stood up extremely well. (Damn, but I did do a good job :-) )

There are claims I should not call it a “signature”, but here’s how it is: The top alarmist researchers called it a fingerprint or a signature, the graph explicitly states that the hot spot is the pattern caused by “well mixed greenhouse gases”, and basically, if you think it’s misleading to talk about fingerprints of greenhouse gases in climate models, then you’ll have to take that up with people like Ben Santer, not me.

Jo Nova

About these ads

3 Responses to Jo Nova: So is the hotspot a “fingerprint” or signature? Is it unique?

  1. JoNova is right again!

    Climate e-mails and documents are but the tip of a cancerous growth that developed on government science because world leaders reacted in fear to the “nuclear fire” that consumed Hiroshima on 6 Aug 1945 because scientists had learned how to release the energy (E) stored as mass (m) in the cores of a.) Heavy atoms like Uranium; b.) Planets like Jupiter; c.) Ordinary, Sun-like stars; and d.) Galaxies like ours.

    Instead of figuring out how to use E = mc^2 for the benefit of mankind, world leaders were driven by the instinct of survivalto rule, rather than to serve, mankind by

    1. Uniting Nations, and
    2. Hiding information on E = mc^2

    The Timeline:

    1945: Hiroshima vanishes because E = mc^2: 6 Aug 1945
    1945: United Nations Charter is ratified: October 24, 1945

    __Immediate U-turn: Changes interior of Sun from Fe to H
    __See: “Home Is Where the Wind Blows” (1994) p 153-154

    1946: Solar interior changes*: Iron (Fe) into Hydrogen (H)
    1956: Publication blocked of Earth’s natural “nuclear fires”
    1965: P.D. Jose, “Solar motion and sunspots,” Astron J 70, 193-200

    __Homogeneous Sun in hydrostatic equilibrium
    __Solar Physics 3, 5-25 (1968) __http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1968SoPh….3….5G

    1967: The Bilderberg model, Solar Physics 3, 5-25 (1968)
    1975: Evidence of local element synthesis in Sun is hidden
    1977: The scientist that reported the pulsar Sun vanished
    1983: S.W. evidence of iron(Fe)-rich solar interior ignored
    1986: Challenger disaster** delays confirmation in Jupiter
    1989: Government tries to discredit cold fusion discovery
    1993: Possibility of nuclear reactor reported in Earth core
    1995: NASA hides Jupiter data confirming Iron (Fe) Sun
    1998: CSPAN*** captures NASA’s release of Jupiter data
    2001: Neutron repulsion solves the Solar Neutrino Puzzle
    2001: 178 SNO scientists report solar neutrino oscillation
    2001: Twin Towers disaster reunites nations common goal
    2008: Nature assigns credit for natural reactors to others
    2009: Climategate emails and documents show deception
    2012: Dr. Peter Gleick’s actions reveal AGU/NAS at work

    Footnotes:

    * Read opinions of Sir Fred Hoyle and Sir Arthur Eddington before 6 Aug 1946 [Fred Hoyle, "Home Is Where the Wind Blows," University Science Books, 1994, pp. 153-154].

    **See CNN video of 1986 Challenger disaster:

    ***CSPAN video; NASA releases Jupiter data to confirm pre-1946 Iron (Fe) Sun:

    - Oliver - http://omanuel.wordpress.com/about/

  2. Read the opinions of Sir Fred Hoyle and Sir Arthur Eddington before “nuclear fire” consumed Hiroshima on 6 Aug 1946 [Fred Hoyle, "Home Is Where the Wind Blows," University Science Books, 1994, page 153].

    “We both believed that the sun was made mostly of iron, . . .”

    “The high-iron solution continued to reign supreme in the interim (at any rate, in the astronomical circles to which I was privy) until after the Second World War, . . .” [Fred Hoyle, "Home Is Where the Wind Blows," University Science Books, 1994, page 153].

    During the space age, the iron-rich sun was reaffirmed by analysis of

    a.) Meteorites in 1975
    b.) Apollo lunar samples in 1983
    c.) Jupiter’s atmosphere in Galileo probe in 1995

    And the results were hidden, ignored or manipulated because world leaders did not want the public to know that our lives, Earth’s climate, and our fate are controlled by the “nuclear fire” in the neutron-rich core of the sun.

    With kind regards,
    Oliver K. Manuel
    Former NASA Principal
    Investigator for Apollo
    http://omanuel.wordpress.com/about/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s