If NASA has no official position on climate change, as claimed to Andy Revkin by as-usual clueless Gavin Schmidt, what is this? “NASA Policy Statement - Adapting to a Changing Climate” (May 2011)
There are two points about it:
(1) I won’t hold my breath waiting for some of the involved folks to wake up to the idea that if they write something as “NASA Head of this” or “NASA Head of that”, then ipso facto their statements will be taken as “Official NASA Position” on this or that.
In the private sector, anything one writes in the course of business is of course considered what his/her company thinks about that course of business. How can it be any different?
(2) NASA doesn’t live in a vacuum. It can’t play the Ivory Tower Scientist today, and the Federal Agency tomorrow. If the Government pursues one particular line of thought (eg for worry of dangerous climate change), then NASA of course is pursuing that same line of thought.
Therefore…NASA has a very big OFFICIAL POSITION on climate change indeed.