WSJ: Supremes 9, EPA 0

“The Justices rebuke the bureaucracy’s water torture.”

The Wall Street Journal editorializes:

… In a concurring opinion in Sackett v. EPA, Justice Alito accurately noted that, despite the ruling, “the combination of the uncertain reach of the Clean Water Act and draconian penalties imposed for the sort of violations alleged in this case still leaves most property owners with little practical alternative but to dance to the EPA’s tune.”

Congress ought to amend the Clean Water Act to make the law’s jurisdiction clearer. Meantime, the ordeal of the Sacketts shows once again how this agency with a $10 billion budget and 17,000 agents has become a regulatory tyranny for millions of law-abiding Americans.

About these ads

2 responses to “WSJ: Supremes 9, EPA 0

  1. I don’t understand the headline. It should read: Obama zero, people 100!

  2. While this was more a “procedural” victory, I was very surprised to see it 9-0. Kagan just bitch slapped her old boss.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s