Climategate 2.0: Revkin ‘trusted’ by the alarmists

But can anyone else trust Revkin?

From the Climategate 2.0 collection, the MetOffice’s John Kennedy writes to Phil Jones about an upcoming media release:

I have arranged to chat with Nature tomorrow as well.

I agree with Phil’s comments on the press release…

I suggest we get the release finalized by Thursday. At that time I will send what we have to the CSU press office (and I’m guessing Mike will do the same with the UW press office).

I’ve agreed to chat with any Nature reporters on the story. But otherwise I’m going to be pretty cautious about what reporters I chat with… I’ll let all of you know if there are
any other reasonable interview requests from folks we trust (eg Andy Revkin, etc)
.

-Dave

Read the e-mail exchange below.

————————————
cc: John Kennedy , Mike Wallace

date: Mon, 19 May 2008 15:45:48 +0100
from: David Thompson
subject: Re: Press release plus Nature
to: Phil Jones

Phil et al…
I have arranged to chat with Nature tomorrow as well.
I agree with Phil’s comments on the press release. Also: didn’t Dick Reynolds also
identify
the role of the buoys? (the press release makes it sound only the Hadley Centre has
identified this bias)
I suggest we get the release finalized by Thursday. At that time I will send what we have
to the CSU press office (and I’m guessing Mike will do the same with the UW press
office).
I’ve agreed to chat with any Nature reporters on the story. But otherwise I’m going to be
pretty cautious about what reporters I chat with… I’ll let all of you know if there are
any other reasonable interview requests from folks we trust (eg Andy Revkin, etc).
-Dave
On May 19, 2008, at 1:55 PM, Phil Jones wrote:
John,
The first 4 paragraphs are fine. The last paragraph seems to have crept
back from an earlier version! I guess my problem with it is the first sentence.
The last sentence of para 5 has already been said at the end of para 4.
The second and third sentences of para 5 are OK if they have a slightly different
first sentence. Maybe just say ‘We are working to improve the SST data entering
the global temperature dataset.’ and then ‘We have identified two principal biases
in the SST record…’
Whilst writing this email I’ve been called by Nature about the news item they

are going to run on this. This has to be ready this Thursday (22cnd). The person
doing this is in Germany and he seems to think it is my paper! I’ve put him
right on this and he will be contacting you – I’ll send him details.
He’s going to send me our final pdf. He has a draft of the news and views item,
but this is very much a draft.
This Thursday – his draft news item, our pdf and the N&V item all go out
emabrgoed to the press.
Cheers
Phil
At 13:42 16/05/2008, John Kennedy wrote:
All,
I’ve attached the latest version of the press release. I’ve stripped off
the additional information and removed some of the text about keying in
new data.
The press office and other interested parties haven’t seen it yet, which
is the next stage.
John
On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 10:50 +0100, David Thompson wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
>
> I’ve made a few tweaks to Mike’s version. Text is below.
>
>
> I was also uncomfortable with the Hadley Centre propaganda. I think it
> would have been a lightning rod for the critics.
>
>
> -Dave
>
>
> Using a novel technique to remove the effects of temporary
> fluctuations in global temperature due to El Niño and transient
> weather patterns, researchers at Colorado State University, the
> University of Washington, the UK Met Office and the University of East
> Anglia have highlighted a number of sudden drops in global
> temperature.
>
>
> Most of these drops coincide with the eruptions of large tropical
> volcanoes and are evident in temperatures measured over both the
> world‚s land and ocean areas. But the largest drop, occurring towards
> the end of 1945, is unrelated to any known volcanic eruption and is
> not apparent over land. It appears to arise from an artificial and
> temporary cooling caused by an abrupt change in the mix of US and UK
> ships reporting temperatures at the end of the Second World War.
>
>
> The majority of sea temperature measurements available in
> international data bases between 1941 and 1945 are from US ships. The
> crews of US ships measured the temperature of the water before it was
> used to cool the ships engine. Because of warmth coming from the ship,
> the water was often a little warmer than the true sea temperature. At
> the end of 1945 the number of US observations in the data base dropped
> rapidly while the number of UK observations increased. UK ships
> measured the temperature of water samples collected using special
> buckets. Wind blowing past the buckets as they were hauled onto the
> deck often caused these measurements to be cooler than the actual sea
> temperature. The sudden drop in global-mean temperatures at the end of
> World War 2 is due to the sudden but uncorrected change from US engine
> room measurements – which are biased warm – to UK measurements – which
> are biased cool.
>
>
> Although the drop in 1945 is large in climate-change terms abouut
> 0.3°C its effect is likely to be largest during the period
> immediately after the Second World War and very small by the 1960s,
> when better-insulated buckets came into use and a there was a more
> varied mix of measurements from different national merchant shipping
> fleets. Correcting the drop will change the character of middle
> century temperature variablity during the period following World War
> 2, but it is expected to have little effect on 20th century warming
> trends, which are corroborated by independent records of air
> temperatures taken over both land and sea.
>
>
> Climate researchers at the Met Office Hadley Centre are working to
> reduce the biases in the temperature datasets. In the past two years,
> many hundreds of thousands of observations have been keyed in from
> hand-written log books that were kept aboard ships in the UK navy,
> particularly for the periods of sparse marine coverage, such as the
> two World War periods. Fixing the drop is unlikely to radically alter
> our understanding of climate change, but having a more accurate record
> of the real temperature change during the mid-20th century could
> provide insight into the more subtle mechanisms that caused the early
> rise in temperatures to the 1920s and the subsequent flattening of the
> temperature curve that lasted into the early 1970s.
>
>
>
> Extra information:
>
>
> Marine temperatures are much more prone to systematic biases arising
> from changes in the way the measurements are taken and the platforms
> used than are land air temperatures. For example, since the 1970s,
> sea surface temperatures have been estimated from satellites, but
> these need considerable adjustment (sometimes in excess of 2 deg C) to
> be comparable with ship and buoy measurements. The satellite sees only
> the top millimetre of the ocean surface, while traditional ship-based
> sampling sees the top few metres. A change is gradually talking place
> across the world‚s oceans in the way sea surface temperature
> measurements are made during the last ten years: the number of ship-
> based measurements has reduced slightly, but there is a dramatic
> increase in the number of measurements coming from automatic
> measurements taken on fixed and drifting buoys. Work is underway to
> determine the size of the difference between the ships and buoys, as
> the bias between the two could be of the same order as that in the
> 1940s.

John Kennedy Climate Monitoring and Research Scientist
Met Office Hadley Centre FitzRoy Road Exeter EX1 3PB
Tel: +44 (0)1392 885105 Fax: +44 (0)1392 885681
E-mail: [1]john.kennedy@metoffice.gov.uk [2]http://www.metoffice.gov.uk
Global climate data sets are available from [3]http://www.hadobs.org
Prof. Phil Jones
Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090
School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784
University of East Anglia
Norwich Email [4]p.jones@uea.ac.uk
NR4 7TJ
UK —————————————————————————-

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s